- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:10:10 +0200
- To: "Knud Hinnerk Möller" <knud.moeller@deri.org>
- Cc: "Damian Steer" <damian.steer@hp.com>, semantic-web@w3c.org
On 7/25/06, Knud Hinnerk Möller <knud.moeller@deri.org> wrote: > > > Am 25.07.2006 um 10:23 schrieb Damian Steer: > Yep, and that's why and additional foaf:topic statement seems to be > necessary. How much do you need to say about the topic object other than it exists? Or maybe - _:person foaf:interest _:document . _:document foaf:topic _:concept . _:concept rdf:type skos:Concept . This brings to mind the problem Elias Torres mentions with del.icio.us (and similar) tags, his case was the tag "queso" at del.icio.us is used for both "things involving cheese" and "a Semantic Web-enhanced Atom Protocol server ". Basically the concept the tag stands for is both of these, and probably a lot more. But is it necessary to disambiguate up front, can't it be left until problems are noticed? (How?) Hmm, although the Wikipedia has disambiguation...er, remind me what the problem was again..? Cheers, Danny. [1] http://torrez.us/archives/2006/07/21/473/ -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 21:10:26 UTC