Re: Is RDFa ready to use with GRDDL?

Thank you Ivan, Ralph, Harry and Karl for the information.

Per Karl[1], RDFa cannot be fully used in a conformant way to the XHTML 1.0 (or 1.1)
but GRDDL will not be used with XHTML 2.0 that comes with full RDFa...

Hmm, I wonder what people think about this.

(1) Is there any discussion in the Semantic Web Deployment WG about making the RDFa
syntax conformant to XHTML 1.0 (or 1.1)?

(2) Is there any discussion in the HTML working group about making XHTML 1.2 (or later)
which allows full RDFa ?

(3) Is there any discussion in the HTML working group about drawing back the decision 
(i.e. picking up again the profile attribute in XHTML 2.0)?

(4) Is there any discussion in the GRDDL working group about changing the GRDDL definition
so as for GRDDL to be used with XHTML 2.0 (without the profile attribute)?

Well, for now, 
I can live with invalid XHTML 1.* documents with full RDFa which can be processed by GRDDL
(with my ears shut) only if there supplied (XSL) transformations,
but I hope we can reach a consensus which resolves the inconsistency.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Aug/0150.html
-- 
Yoshio Fukushige <fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com>
Network Development Center,
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 09:30:29 UTC