- From: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:14:58 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Tim Finin" <finin@cs.umbc.edu>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, "Li Ding" <dingli1@cs.umbc.edu>, "Tim Finin" <finin@cs.umbc.edu>, "Lushan Han" <lushan1@umbc.edu>, "Rong Pan" <panrong1@umbc.edu>, "Anupam Joshi" <joshi@cs.umbc.edu>
Tim,
Why does Swoogle offer the options of searching ontologies, or ontologies
and instance data ("document"), but not instance data without ontologies?
This would make it easier for people interested in instance data to get at
it.
Bob
On Sat, August 12, 2006 1:13 pm, Tim Finin wrote:
>
> Tim Finin wrote:
> > Swoogle [1] has a collection of over 1M error-free RDF
> > documents collected from the Web and an additional ~700K
> > ...
> > Only about 5% of these documents contain *any* triples that
> > contribute to a definition. The rest consist of all data.
> > ...
>
> I posted some fresh data extracted from Swoogle on our research blog:
>
> http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/08/12/is-there-real-world-rdf-sowl-instance-data/
>
> The data show the number of Semantic Web documents broken down by
> schema vs. data and the percentage of classes and properties that
> have been used to encode data. Tim
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 12:17:02 UTC