- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:09:28 -0500
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, Franck Cotton <franck.cotton@insee.fr>
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 19:02 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Dan > >> > >> Would that be acceptable for both of you? > >> > > > > Hmm... yes, I think so. > > > Great. Glad we come to some consensus, thanks to Eric. > > Note that what the tabulator will do is follow both seeAlso links > > and merge the data from DOC1 and DOC2. That seems consistent > > with what you intend: "equally normative". > > > > > Yes. But it might happen that the merged data are not consistent, > although of course separately DOC1 and DOC2 should be. That's not what "equally normative" means to me; "equally normative" implies consistent, no? > Bernard -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 19:09:32 UTC