Le lundi 07 août 2006 à 10:26 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit :
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:59 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> > Dan
> > > Ah... I misread your point. Indeed, in the general case,
> > > lots of documents may discuss the same resource, and none
> > > of them is authoritative. If DOC1#T1 and DOC2#T1 both
> > > refer to France, there is no web architecture mechanism
> > > for determining which is authoritative.
> > >
> > OK. But I don't want to have DOC1#T1 *and* DOC2#T1 as two distinct URIs
> > defining France. I want one URI to define France.
>
> Do you have any serious expectation that you will get it? i.e.
> that you can somehow stop other parties from coining URIs that
> refer to France?
Of course not but in our case both DOC1 and DOC2 are published by the
INSEE and I don't see the reason for a single entity to coin different
URIs for the same concept.
Eric
--
GPG-PGP: 2A528005
Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online.
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 7 August 2006 15:58:01 UTC