- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:53:23 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:59 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > >> Dan >> >>> Ah... I misread your point. Indeed, in the general case, >>> lots of documents may discuss the same resource, and none >>> of them is authoritative. If DOC1#T1 and DOC2#T1 both >>> refer to France, there is no web architecture mechanism >>> for determining which is authoritative. >>> >>> >> OK. But I don't want to have DOC1#T1 *and* DOC2#T1 as two distinct URIs >> defining France. I want one URI to define France. >> > > Do you have any serious expectation that you will get it? i.e. > that you can somehow stop other parties from coining URIs that > refer to France? > Of course not! But that's a completely orthogonal issue (not that I'm not interested in that issue, too). We're speaking here about a unique publisher (INSEE) who wants to support semantic interoperability through forging a unique, authoritative URI for France, for every possible use under their authoritative namespace, for any purpose, in any publication. Bernard
Received on Monday, 7 August 2006 15:53:33 UTC