- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:03:13 -0500
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>, Franck Cotton <franck.cotton@insee.fr>
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 12:15 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Dan > > Out of your exchanges, Eric will certainly come out with a smart and > elegant solution for serving something else than 404 pages for the > various URIs in the namespace http://rdf.insee.fr/geo/, and (almost) > everybody and the TAG will be happy with it. Nevertheless, I would like > to go further in this discussion. > > Don Connolly a écrit : > > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 23:53 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote: > > [...] > > > >> And actually, this should be the general situation in SW publication : > >> there is no authoritative, definitive, complete, description of a > >> resource, packaged in one file, with a single access point. > >> > > > > Yes, there are authoritative descriptions in the Semantic Web. > > > Yes, there are. But if you look at them, those are rather exceptions > than the general rule. When I write the *general situation*, it means > what it means : most resources can't have a *single* authoritative > description, for various reasons. More below. Ah... I misread your point. Indeed, in the general case, lots of documents may discuss the same resource, and none of them is authoritative. If DOC1#T1 and DOC2#T1 both refer to France, there is no web architecture mechanism for determining which is authoritative. The point I was making is there are authoritative descriptions corresponding to URIs. Whatever whatever http responses the owner of DOC1#T1 gives are authoritative descriptions of DOC1#T1. And yes, things change over time. [...] > > It seems very unnatural to me to use anything other than a single > > static file for the case of an ontology with just a few dozen terms. > > Maybe a handful of content-negotiated static files. But not more than > > that. > > > > > Just a few dozen terms, yes. But with semantics not so "static" as you > would like them to be. geo:Region is not rdfs:subClassOf - The real > world apologizes for being so messy, changing and unstable :-) . It's reasonably straightforward to change the contents of a static file on a web server, no? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 7 August 2006 13:03:34 UTC