- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:53:24 -0700
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>, Franck Cotton <franck.cotton@insee.fr>
I suspect this is an area in which URIQA could be useful -- put a URIQA handler behind the ontology portion of the address space, and let it return useful RDF for the request URI. This works best for resources without fragIDs, of course; for resources with fragIDs it might be good to supplement the CBD with "and any term with a fragment under this URI", though URIQA has workarounds in the spec[1]. -R [1] <http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html> On 4 Aug 2006, at 6:13 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > SemWeb people need to think long and hard over > this one, and most importantly, make some *tools* to make the job of > maintaining semantic web data at URIs easy.
Received on Saturday, 5 August 2006 03:53:44 UTC