- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:53:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: fmanola@acm.org
- Cc: ujohnmc@ReedElsevier.com, semantic-web@w3.org
From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> Subject: Re: question on domain Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:51:21 -0400 > Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB) wrote: > > Hello, [...] > > Based on my understanding, one can define a property and then specify > > the domain for that property which is the list of classes in which that > > property is allowed. > > Not quite. As several other responders have noted, specifying the > domain doesn't *disallow* use of the property with instances of other > classes. What it does is license inferences about what classes your > instance is also a member of, based on the domain declaration. You are > free to disregard those inferences if you don't think they are > appropriate. Huh? Do you actually mean that you can legitimately use RDF(S) and ignore the meaning its constructs? [...] > --Frank Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 13:54:09 UTC