- From: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:22:08 +0100
- To: "Matt Williams" <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk>
- Cc: jena-dev@yahoogroups.com, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:22:17 UTC
Hi Matt, Thank you very much for the very interesting report on your work. I have read it through and it does, indeed, seem to be a very promising approach with real potential value (as I imagine) to your intended users. It will be very interesting to evaluate what happens when professionals without prior agreement, try to form a clinical opinion using a tool based on these sorts of methods for DSS. Since you are combining this approach to logic with ontology descriptions it readily could have applicability outside of the medical field. Adam On 18/04/06, Matt Williams <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > As some know, I am working on integrating ontological information with > arguments. I have just submitted my mid-term report for my PhD Thesis > committee, and it is available at: > http://acl.icnet.uk/~mw/MattWilliamsMTR2006.pdf for anyone interested. > It's a little light on detail, but provides some high and mid-level > descriptions of what I've been doing. > > Comments welcomed. > > Matt > -- > Dr. M. Williams MRCP(UK) > Clinical Research Fellow, > Cancer Research UK > +44 (0)7834 899570 > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 15:22:17 UTC