- From: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:29:44 +0200
- To: "'Yuzhong Qu'" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>, "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>, <aginsberg@imc.mitre.org>
Hi Yuzhong, Your reference to "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF" is VERY useful. Thanks! Regards, Hans -----Original Message----- From: Yuzhong Qu [mailto:yzqu@seu.edu.cn] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:38 To: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl; Peter F. Patel-Schneider Cc: semantic-web@w3.org; aginsberg@imc.mitre.org Subject: Re: Inheritance and RIF Hi, Hans, In addition to Peter's comment, a possibel solution (practically) to your question is as follows: // About knowledge modeling weight is a owl:DatatypeProperty with xsd:postiveInteger (or xsd:decimal, if you like) as its rdfs:range; weight is also a owl:FunctionalProperty. (if the tense issue is ignored) Lightweight is a user-defined XML Schema Datatype, e.g. ranging from 130 to135. [See "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF", http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-xsch-datatypes/ , for details on defining your own datatypes ] LightweightBoxer is a subClassOf Boxer and also be restricted to Lightweight w.r.t. the weight property. // About usage When you assert that John Doe is a 'lightweight boxer', the weight of John Doe must be "a value" between 130 and135. Yuzhong Qu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> To: <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl> Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>; <aginsberg@imc.mitre.org> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 5:05 AM Subject: Re: Inheritance and RIF > > From: "Hans Teijgeler" <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl> > Subject: Inheritance and RIF > Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:58:50 +0200 > >> Folks, >> >> I looked for the word "inheritance" in the W3C website, but didn't find >> what I was looking for. >> >> Assume we have a class called 'lightweight boxer'. >> The "criteria for membership" for that class are, amongst others, that >> the weight of any male boxer of that class, right before a match, shall >> be between 130 and 135 lbs. So I may introduce the Properties minWeight >> and maxWeight, with these values. > > Hmm, well, here you are making one of the standard modelling choices that > can lead to problems. > > Note well that the meaning of the "properties" minWeight and maxWeight are > very different from the property weight. The former two are, perhaps, > properties of the class whereas the latter one is a property of instances > of the class. > >> Now I have John Doe, and I type him as 'lightweight boxer'. >> >> Are now the minWeight and maxWeight Properties inherited, even where >> these are meaningless for a person? (because an individual doesn't have, >> at any given point in time, a range value, but a point value) > > And here is where your modelling choice bites you. > >> Or is inheritance only a function that software (reasoners and the like) >> must handle? > > Well, "inheritance" is, at best, a description of what goes on in some > relationships between classes and their instances, or classes and their > subclasses. It is far better to think logically, i.e., *what* follows (or > should follow) instead of *how* to make it follow. > >> Will RIF become a suitable mechanism for that? In this case we would >> need a function that looks at the weight of John Doe and checks whether >> or not that is between minWeight and maxWeight, and if yes confirms that >> the asserted typing was correct, or would even generate that typing (of >> course including other ciriteria, otherwise we would have zillions of >> lightweight boxers in the world). > > Well, RIF shouldn't have any mechanism for inheritance. After all, RIF is > not about classes and instances, but is instead about rules. > >> By the way: does anyone know how to represent a value with a tolerance >> in RDF/OWL? So something like: diameter = 150 mm +0.03% -0.25%. >> >> Regards, >> Hans > > My suggestion to you would be to read the KR literature, where this entire > issue was discussed at length. A good starting point would be > > title= "What's in a Link: > Foundations for Semantic Networks", > author= "Woods, William A.", > pages= "35--82", > booktitle= "Representation and Understanding: > Studies in Cognitive Science", > editor= "Daniel G. Bobrow and Alan M. Collins", > year= 1975, > publisher= "Academic Press", > > This paper also appears in: > > editor= {Ronald J. Brachman Hector J. Levesque}, > title= "Readings in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning", > booktitle= "Readings in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning", > publisher= "Morgan Kaufmann", > address= "San Mateo, California", > year= 1985, > > > Another good paper to read would be: > > title= "What's in a Concept: > Structural Foundations for Semantic Networks", > author= "Brachman, Ronald J.", > journal= "International Journal of Man-Machine Studies", > volume= 9, > number= 2, > month= mar, > year= 1977, > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.4/299 - Release Date: 31-Mar-06 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.4/299 - Release Date: 31-Mar-06
Received on Monday, 3 April 2006 07:30:17 UTC