- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@volcano.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:17:49 -0700
- To: <semantic-web@w3.org>, "www-rdf-logic at W3C" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
- Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>
Correction: {myverb isu verb;} is not quite right. You actually need to use myverb isu verb with ctype=binary relation; And just what does "binary relation" mean? It means that your Mtriple subject myverb object; is expressing a binary relation between subject and object. The full MKR language has many higher "arity" verbs. For example, one of the internal representations of "myverb" uses the ternary MKR verb "rel". Specifically, the statement above becomes subject rel myverb = object; The "object of rel" is the nvphrase myverb=object. Most MKR formats allow a list of nvphrases, or nvlist. The granddaddy of all the MKR verbs (and one of the most significant features of MKR) is "do". Its general format is at nvlist ( subjectlist do nvlist out nvlist of nvlist with nvlist od nvlist from nvlist to nvlist done; }; The "arity" of "do" depends on how you decide to count these variable length lists, but I'd have to say the arity is at least 17. Now you can see why I didn't allow definitions in Mtriples. The definition format is subject is genus with nvlist; (nvlist is the differentia) which has an arity of at least 4. Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://rhm.cdepot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 01:19:16 UTC