Danny Ayers wrote: > snip > > > A little tangential question, do you think this suggests that the > "OntoWorker" kind of approach makes more sense, disposing of > scruffiness like literals and (XSD-styled) datatypes...or does the > pragmatic value of those things clearly outweigh having a more easily > manageable formal model? > "OntoWorker"???? (point me to a description) However, if you mean do I think we ought to replace all literals with URIs, then I don't (and I don't think using literals necessarily creates a less easily manageable formal model either). I had some more to say on this general subject in a message responding to some comments about the RDF Primer: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/0052.html I still think the verdict is out on this stuff. Cheers, --FrankReceived on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 21:56:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:54 UTC