- From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@dsi.unive.it>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
- cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Of course, there's also Metalog (http://www.w3.org/RDF/Metalog ). Like other systems mentioned in the thread, it lacks direct OWL support, but it can nevertheless be used by embedding part of OWL into FOL, and writing the appropriate simulation rules themselves into natural language (which is what we've been doing in a recent project). Of course that's not a satisfactory solution in the long term, that's why OWL built-in support is on its way, although it's more challenging than it seems (esp. wrt keeping a reasonable low level of complexity for the users...). -M On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Xavier Noria wrote: > > I have seen in several places those questions in natural language that are > said to be addressable with, say, the expressiveness and logic properties of > OWL DL. For instance the OWL Guide starts with > > Tell me what wines I should buy to serve with each course > of the following menu. And, by the way, I don't like Sauternes. > > However, I have never seen an algorithm mentioned, nor even a description of > some approach, for how the translation from natural language to some query > language can be automated. Whether some constraints have to be assumed in the > natural language interface, whether it is even possible or not such a > translation, etc. > > Are there any pointers that can help me get the picture? Which is the state > of the art? Or do people always mean the translation as of today has to be > done by a person? > > -- fxn > > PS: I think the OWL Guide may say at the end something about this, because it > starts that way and then it does not make clear it is only going to present a > formal and thus partial solution to the problem. You end up wondering about > the size of the hole between what you have actually read and the solution to > the original opening problem. >
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 15:45:16 UTC