- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:50:04 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Stefano Mazzocchi <stefanom@mit.edu>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
At 02:16 PM 10/24/2005 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Le jeudi 20 octobre 2005 à 14:25 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit : >> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 14:17 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: >> > If you send application/rdf+xml in the accept header then the service >> > will now output that in preference. Everyone else gets application/xml >> >> Ours should work that way to. >> >> Dom, do you know if this is easy to do? > >I can (and made it) output the results using application/rdf+xml; I >can't easily set up the content negotiation aspect. Alistair Miles recently worked out a hack to do something related to this with content negotiation -- specifically, teaching Apache to return either an application/rdf+xml view, a text/html, or a text/xml view depending on what the request stated in Accept. (This is in the context of returning either a human-readable or a machine- interpretable resource at an RDF namespace URI). Perhaps Alistair's technique can be adapted to the GRDDL purpose. See "[VM] content-dependent redirects in apache ... help!" [1] and "RE: [VM] content-dependent redirects in apache ... help!" [2] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0017.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0024.html
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 12:50:27 UTC