W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Introducing Embedded RDF (GRDDL demo media type RFE)

From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:50:04 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20051024084517.02be1cd8@127.0.0.1>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Stefano Mazzocchi <stefanom@mit.edu>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>, semantic-web@w3.org

At 02:16 PM 10/24/2005 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le jeudi 20 octobre 2005 à 14:25 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit :
>> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 14:17 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: 
>> > If you send application/rdf+xml in the accept header then the service
>> > will now output that in preference. Everyone else gets application/xml
>> 
>> Ours should work that way to.
>> 
>> Dom, do you know if this is easy to do?
>
>I can (and made it) output the results using application/rdf+xml; I
>can't easily set up the content negotiation aspect.

Alistair Miles recently worked out a hack to do something related to
this with content negotiation -- specifically, teaching Apache to return
either an application/rdf+xml view, a text/html, or a text/xml view
depending on what the request stated in Accept.  (This is in the
context of returning either a human-readable or a machine-
interpretable resource at an RDF namespace URI).

Perhaps Alistair's technique can be adapted to the GRDDL purpose.

See "[VM] content-dependent redirects in apache ... help!" [1]
and "RE: [VM] content-dependent redirects in apache ... help!" [2]

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0017.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0024.html
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 12:50:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:40:56 UTC