W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2005

RE: Mustangs vs myMustang

From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:19:14 +0200
To: geoff@sover.net
Cc: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl, semantic-web@w3c.org
Message-ID: <OF1E804AA8.8C92028A-ONC125709B.0063E27A-C125709B.00648FE7@agfa.com>

True, that should do it and I was too much thinking about
chained properties, such as :uncle :-)

-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/




"Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>
Sent by: semantic-web-request@w3.org
15/10/2005 19:49

 
        To:     Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA, <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
        cc:     <semantic-web@w3c.org>
        Subject:        RE: Mustangs vs myMustang



How about something like this:

:Mustangs rdfs:subClassOf 
                 [
                                 a owl:Restriction;
                                 owl:hasValue :FordCompany; 
                                 owl:onProperty [owl:inverseOf 
:isManufacturerOf]
                 ]

-Geoff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] 
On
> Behalf Of jos.deroo@agfa.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:19 PM
> To: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl
> Cc: semantic-web@w3c.org; semantic-web-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Mustangs vs myMustang
> 
> 
> Hi, Hans
> 
> My take would be to use a rule:
> 
> {?M :isManufacturerOf ?C.
>  ?C rdf:type ?B}
>  => {?M :yourProperty ?B}.
> 
> so that from
> 
> :FordCompany :isManufacturerOf :myMustang.
> :myMustang rdf:type :Mustangs.
> 
> it follows that
> 
> :FordCompany :yourProperty :Mustangs.
> 
> 
> --
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
> 
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2005 18:19:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:40:56 UTC