- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:19:14 +0200
- To: geoff@sover.net
- Cc: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl, semantic-web@w3c.org
True, that should do it and I was too much thinking about
chained properties, such as :uncle :-)
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
"Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>
Sent by: semantic-web-request@w3.org
15/10/2005 19:49
To: Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA, <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
cc: <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Subject: RE: Mustangs vs myMustang
How about something like this:
:Mustangs rdfs:subClassOf
[
a owl:Restriction;
owl:hasValue :FordCompany;
owl:onProperty [owl:inverseOf
:isManufacturerOf]
]
-Geoff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of jos.deroo@agfa.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:19 PM
> To: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl
> Cc: semantic-web@w3c.org; semantic-web-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Mustangs vs myMustang
>
>
> Hi, Hans
>
> My take would be to use a rule:
>
> {?M :isManufacturerOf ?C.
> ?C rdf:type ?B}
> => {?M :yourProperty ?B}.
>
> so that from
>
> :FordCompany :isManufacturerOf :myMustang.
> :myMustang rdf:type :Mustangs.
>
> it follows that
>
> :FordCompany :yourProperty :Mustangs.
>
>
> --
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
>
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2005 18:19:58 UTC