Re: Mustangs vs myMustang

I think this is what you're looking for.
There's a pretty good chance my syntax is right.
But the real question is: can a property have
two different kinds of ranges as these declarations do.
I'll see if I can validate these statements.

#       Ford Company   isManufacturerOf   Mustangs
#       Ford Company   isManufacturerOf   myMustang

<owl:Property rdf:ID="isManufacturerOf">
        <rdf:domain rdf:resource="#Company"/>
        <rdf:range rdf:resource="#CarBrand"/>
        <rdf:range rdf:resource="#Car"/>
</owl:Property>

<Company rdf:ID="FordCompany"/>

<CarBrand rdf:ID="Mustangs">
        <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Car">
</CarBrand>

<Car rdf:ID="myMustang"/>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="#Mustangs"/>
</Car>

<FordCompany> <isManufacturerOf> <Mustangs/>
<FordCompany> <isManufacturerOf> <myMustang/>

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://rhm.cdepot.net/
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hans Teijgeler 
  To: semantic-web@w3c.org 
  Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:10 AM
  Subject: Mustangs vs myMustang


  Hi,

   

  I am still not 100% certain how to model the following:

   

  -         Ford Company   isManufacturerOf   Mustangs

  -         Ford Company   isManufacturerOf   myMustang

   

  It seems that in both cases the same code is used, but I may be totally wrong.

   

  I'd appreciate some enlightment.

   

  Regards,

  Hans

  _______________________ 

  Hans Teijgeler

  ISO 15926 specialist

  www.InfowebML.ws

  hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl

  phone +31-72-509 2005