- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:14:00 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Joshua Tauberer <tauberer@for.net>, David Powell <djpowell@djpowell.net>, "Hammond, Tony" <T.Hammond@nature.com>, SWIG <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 10/6/05, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > >From the FAQ I wrote for http://taguri.org/ : > > Q: Are tags good RDF identifiers? > > A: As with XML Namespaces, there are two schools of thought. Do you > want the web's default mechanism at your disposal for fetching > information about the identified thing? If so, then HTTP URIs are > probably better used. This reminds me, perhaps you can save me trawling the docs. The URI for every property I've ever seen uses the http: scheme. But is the http: scheme actually mandated anywhere in the specs? It does make sense to use http: URIs, it's useful to have something available on the Web for those URIs. (It looks like a RDDL doc at the ns URI might be the something favoured by the TAG: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#namespaceDocument-8 ) But is it The Law? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 09:14:06 UTC