W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2005

RE: Instantiation

From: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:09:54 +0100
Message-Id: <200511091410.jA9E9sxe012410@vmx40.multikabel.net>
To: "'Jeroen van der Ham'" <vdham@science.uva.nl>, "'Semantic Web Forum'" <semantic-web@w3.org>

Hi Jeroen,

Thanks! It feels good not to be the only one puzzled about this.

The thread "died" on 23 Jan. 2001. Can anyone tell me what the final outcome
of this dispute is? The Recommendation isn't clear (not to me that is :-) )


-----Original Message-----
From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeroen van der Ham
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 2:41 PM
To: Semantic Web Forum
Subject: Re: Instantiation

Hans Teijgeler wrote:
> - one can use rdf:about when it is not accompanied by a statement, 
> now or earlier or imported, with rdf:ID that instantiates it

As far as I understood it, rdf:about can be used in any place where you 
would use rdf:ID, no matter whether the value has been "defined" before 
or not.

In fact, I found a discussion[1] where it was suggested that you use 
only rdf:about, to make it simpler.


[1]: http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0048.html
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2005 14:10:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:40:57 UTC