- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:45:36 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On 11/1/05, Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> wrote: > http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/schemarama/ Wonderful. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on how suitable this approach might be with Atom/OWL [1]. This is basically the Atom syndication modelled in RDF/OWL (work in progress, expect a request-for-feedback post to list sometime soon). There is already a lot of scope with Atom for validation at the syntax level, but I've been playing a little with validation at the model level using OWL constraints (some notes at [2]). I anticipate this will be pretty limited compared to the syntax stuff, but thought it could be useful for ensuring some level of sanity for Atom data when in the RDF/OWL world. (A particular variety of app I envisage is an Atom Store built on a triplestore, so it would have sources/sinks of Atom format/protocol). If I understand correctly, the Schemarama approach could take this even further towards the constraints given in the Atom spec. Does that make sense? Cheers, Danny. [1] http://atomowl.org/ [2] http://dannyayers.com/archives/2005/10/18/atomowl-ontology-testing/ -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 09:45:44 UTC