- From: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:03:39 +0800
- To: "Jeremy Wong" <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk>
- Cc: "SWIG" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 20 March 2005 06:59:30 UTC
I think it's ok. Any problem did you find in this case? Yuzhong Qu ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremy Wong To: semantic-web@w3.org Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 1:18 PM Subject: Fw: rdfs:subPropertyOf + owl:inverseOf ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremy Wong To: public-owl-dev@w3.org Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:16 AM Subject: rdfs:subPropertyOf + owl:inverseOf Consider the following... <PropA> rdfs:subPropertyOf <PropB> ; owl:inverseOf <PropB> . infers that <PropA> rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty ... Proof.. consider the statement <#A> <PropA> <#B> . infers <#A> <PropB> <#B> . (<PropA> rdfs:subPropertyOf <PropB>) infers indirectly <#B> <PropA> <#A> . (<PropA> owl:inverseOf <PropB>) That means <PropA> is symmetric. It is also true for... <PropC> owl:inverseOf <PropC> ... infers that <PropC> rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty agree or not ? Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 20 March 2005 06:59:30 UTC