- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:58:20 -0800
- To: "Rich Boakes" <rich.boakes@port.ac.uk>, "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Seth Russell" <russell.seth@gmail.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
> The fact that the page is cached is not a > property of the page, so describing it as such > in the model is (IMO) a bad thing, that's the > pollution I try and avoid. Isn't it even worse to describe being cached as part of the object's nature (it's class)? Normally class is used to encapsulate those properties of an object which are "fixed" parts of its basic nature. Cached or not is a variable state.
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:58:25 UTC