W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2005

Re: true/false in RDF?

From: Jeremy Wong <jeremy@miko.hk>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:35:02 +0800
Message-ID: <000f01c52857$9239e260$6502a8c0@miko947ymju833>
To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
I am not too familar with N3 notation about datatype, therefore I provide my example in RDF/XML

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://foobar/page.html" xmlns:myterms="urn:myterms">
  <myterms:isCached rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLSchema#boolean">true</myterms:isCached>

We have typed literal already. Why do you still consider object value?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joshua Allen 
  To: semantic-web@w3.org 
  Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:16 PM
  Subject: true/false in RDF?

  I've decided that I want to use URI object values for my Boolean triples, rather than the literals "true/false".  In other words, instead of:

  http://foobar/page.html  urn:myterms:isCached   "true"

  I want to use:

  http://foobar/page.html  urn:myterms:isCached   http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/true

  I can find zero examples of the latter; only the former.  But I think the latter is right.  Why am I wrong?
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 09:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:52 UTC