- From: Jeremy Wong <jeremy@miko.hk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:35:02 +0800
- To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 09:38:22 UTC
I am not too familar with N3 notation about datatype, therefore I provide my example in RDF/XML <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://foobar/page.html" xmlns:myterms="urn:myterms"> <myterms:isCached rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLSchema#boolean">true</myterms:isCached> </rdf:Description> We have typed literal already. Why do you still consider object value? Jeremy ----- Original Message ----- From: Joshua Allen To: semantic-web@w3.org Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:16 PM Subject: true/false in RDF? I've decided that I want to use URI object values for my Boolean triples, rather than the literals "true/false". In other words, instead of: http://foobar/page.html urn:myterms:isCached "true" I want to use: http://foobar/page.html urn:myterms:isCached http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/true I can find zero examples of the latter; only the former. But I think the latter is right. Why am I wrong?
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 09:38:22 UTC