- From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:52:22 -0500
- To: "'ben syverson'" <w3@likn.org>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of ben syverson > Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 8:49 PM > To: semantic-web@w3.org > Subject: Re: Style question > > > You mean simply put the schema at the URI that defines the namespace? > That is, given: > xmlns:likn="http://likn.org/owl#" > put the ontology at http://likn.org/owl? > Yes. I'm not really sure how widely it's followed as a convention, and I know it's not without controversy, but you'll notice that many of the well known ontologies are retrievable at their uris (treating them as urls) - e.g.: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ -Geoff
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 02:52:46 UTC