- From: David Price <david.price@eurostep.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:02:40 -0000
- To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
The OASIS PLCS TC is standardizing data exchange for product life cycle support (logistics support, maintenance planning, solution support engineering). It is applying an external OWL class hierarchy to add semantics to the data exchange structures. The data exchange structures are based on ISO 10303-239 Product Life Cycle Support and are defined in a modeling language called ISO EXPRESS (more or less equivalent to UML Static Class diagrams). We've translated the ISO EXPRESS into OWL to facilitate this exchange and have implemented a prototype OWL Server using Web Services giving those involved in the first prototypes access to the class library. I presented this at the ISWC 2004 in November. See http://www.exff.org/semweb.html where you'll find a paper called Applying Semantic Web Technology to the Life Cycle Support of Complex Engineering Assets Cheers, David -----Original Message----- From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frank Manola Sent: 01 March 2005 14:41 To: semantic-web@w3.org Subject: request for info on Semantic Web business applications The question "are there any real business applications of Semantic Web technology?" comes up all the time. It's come up before on this list, and came up again at the Semantic Web Interest Group meeting now going on in Boston. I've (been?) volunteered to gather information on that subject, so I'm soliciting input from the list. I'll try to organize this information and post either it or a suitable URL to the list. Please reply to the list, rather than just to me, so everyone can see the answers, and participate in the discussion. The information I'm looking for falls in one or more of the following categories: a. Actual instances of (what you think are) existing business applications of Semantic Web technology (and pointers to more information, if it's available). The general outline of what I'm looking for here is something like: FOO (a company, industry sector, etc.) is applying BAR (a Semantic Web technology or language) to do BAZ (some kind of work) Prototypes being developed in conjunction with customers can be included, if they're identified as such, but I'm not looking for speculation about things that *could* at some point reasonably be Semantic Web applications, unless they're considered a potential future extension of some more concrete activity. Also, I'm not using "applications" here to mean programs that parse or store or edit RDF, OWL, etc., or things of that sort. "Applications" here means things like interchange of real estate or scientific data, knowledge collection and management, metadata about resources of various kinds, agents and other "smart" applications, etc. Finally, "business" isn't restricted to private enterprise; government applications are fine too. b. If you are looking for Semantic Web business applications, what criteria do you use for determining what a "business application" is, or what sorts of applications do you consider "business applications"? (I'm asking this question because apparently just because a Semantic Web technology is used in some business activity doesn't necessarily mean it counts as a "business application" to everyone). c. If you think that certain applications given as examples of business applications are *not* business applications, please say why you think they aren't. Further background: There are a number of what some of us consider existing business applications of Semantic Web technology identified in the RDF Primer and other W3C documents and presentations on the Semantic Web and related areas. Nevertheless, the question of whether there are any business applications continues to arise. Part of the problem is probably that we're simply not getting the word out well enough. But another part is that we don't necessarily have a thorough understanding of what people are looking for when they say "business application". Hence this message. Thanks for your help. --Frank
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2005 13:11:14 UTC