- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gonza.gmuer.ch>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:37:09 +0200
- To: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
While I think its a feasible approach (some comments inline below) I don't see how this replaces owl alias inferencing, but rather as way to automatically guess owl:sameAs statements. On 0, James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com> wrote: .... > -- Partial Solution -- > For the specific case when talking about information resources accessed over > HTTP, I see some possibilities for alias inferencing without OWL. > > * Say one URL redirects to the other URL. In that case, then it is a good bet > they indicate the same resource. the first resource could be - accorind to the httpRange findings - a non-information resource, while the second has to be. Even if both are information resource I think they are hardly identical when the redirect is temporary (http 302 and 307), such as a redirect from http://example.org/action-day to http://example.org/action-day/2005. > > * Say you download one representation from one URL via a 2xx code. Then > download from the second URL a representation in the same media type as the > first URL. If the media types and representations are the same, then the two > are probably the same information resource. seems a bit risky: first you download http://example.org/mysong, get an ogg-vorbis file, then you request an ogg-vorbis file from http://example.org/mysong.ogg and you find the same media type and represenation. However the fisrt URL represents "my song" while the second the ogg-vorbis encoding of "my song". > .... > [2] E.G. using > > <http://norman.walsh.name/knows/who#danny-ayers> > > or > > <http://dannyayers.com/misc/foaf/foaf.rdf> > > (OK, technically DA is a blank node in that document but still...) DA definitively isn't a document, I've met him ;-) but <http://dannyayers.com/misc/foaf/foaf.rdf> foaf:primaryTopic <http://norman.walsh.name/knows/who#danny-ayers> reto
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 00:54:41 UTC