- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:48:30 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:51:11 +0100, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 8 Feb 2005, at 19:17, Henry Story wrote: > > I suppose the simple solution would be to just write > > > > :relation rdfs:sameAs rdfs:sameAs . > > of course I meant > > :relation owl:sameAs owl:sameAs . > > > but I just found the place in the spec that mentions this > > > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#equivalentProperty-def> > > > > I should just say > > > > :relation owl:equivalentProperty rdfs:sameAs . > > and here I meant > > :relation owl:equivalentProperty owl:sameAs . > > > Thanks for pointing out those interesting quirks concerning > > complex properties. Quirk is the word! I was clearly wrong about putting equivalentClass in the middle - x:relation is between individuals, not classes. But using sameAs seems to push it beyond what is required, you only need _blank and <http://bblfish.net/> to be in the same classes, they don't have to be identical. Can that even be expressed with OWL/RDF? Heh, nice puzzle... -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 00:27:38 UTC