Re: Typo: "apllication/rdf+xml"; broken mailer

I do, I was just so frustrated nobody ever noticed the rdf part in the 
emails. Please apologize.

Reto

Etan Wexler schrieb:

> reto,
>
> nobody believes you story, please admit that this was just a fake to
> advertise some KnoBot features.
>
> Etan
>
> Reto Bachmann-Gmür schrieb:
>
>>
>> Hmm, so you did not the person who wrote the original mail and 
>> claimed to be "Etan Wexler" (the one with the group email as from), 
>> right?
>>
>> This are the headers of the private reply I've got this morning:
>>
>> Return-Path: <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> Received: from chenab.cosmoweb.net (chenab.cosmoweb.net [66.234.224.15])
>>     by gonza.gmuer.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
>> jBN2jYdo019425
>>     (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
>>     for <reto@gmuer.ch>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:45:37 +0100
>> Received: (qmail 28892 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2005 22:08:41 -0500
>> Received: from 71-255-234-66.cosmoweb.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) 
>> (66.234.255.71)
>>  by 192.168.2.15 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2005 22:08:41 -0500
>> Message-ID: <43AB6A56.8060209@w3.org>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:09:10 -0500
>> From: Etan Wexler <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> User-Agent: Thunderbird/1.5
>>
>>
>> This are the ones in the mail I've got from you
>>
>> Return-Path: <ewexler@stickdog.com>
>> Received: from chenab.cosmoweb.net (chenab.cosmoweb.net [66.234.224.15])
>>     by gonza.gmuer.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
>> jBNGDhBO003792
>>     (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
>>     for <reto@gmuer.ch>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:13:58 +0100
>> Received: (qmail 24121 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2005 11:36:52 -0500
>> Received: from 71-255-234-66.cosmoweb.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) 
>> (66.234.255.71)
>>  by 192.168.2.15 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2005 11:36:52 -0500
>> Message-ID: <43AC27BF.9060906@stickdog.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:37:19 -0500
>> From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
>> User-Agent: Thunderbird/1.5
>>
>>
>> Interpretations? (Most competence in the email-header domain I expect 
>> from the other Ethan, but I don't have his email (well probably I do, 
>> but don't know which one) ;-)
>>
>> reto
>>
>>
>> Etan Wexler schrieb:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello, Reto. Hello, Etan. This here is Etan.
>>>
>>> I wonder why Etan would assume the address of a public mailing list. 
>>> Consider this a solicitation for explanation.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 17:57:50 UTC