- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:35:01 +0100
- To: "Russell Duhon" <fugu13@mac.com>, "Misha Wolf" <"Misha.Wolf"@reuters.com>
- Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:54:48 +0100, Russell Duhon <fugu13@mac.com> wrote: > The reification approach would likely be a good bet. > > I've worked up a quick example, working from content in your model > draft ( http://www.iptc.org/ > NAR/1.0/specification/DRAFT-NAR_1.0-spec-Model_12.pdf ) and an example > in the RDF Primer. > > Here's how it might look (fragmentary, of course): > random:triple1 rdf:type rdf:Statement . > random:triple1 rdf:subject random:item42 . > random:triple1 rdf:predicate newsml:provider . > random:triple1 rdf:object "iptc.org"^^xsd:string . > random:triple1 newsml:confidence "0.4"^^xsd:float . Earlier drafts of EARL actually took this approach. While it is functionally pretty similar, we moved away from it because it seemed just a tiny bit more complex to explain, and it really got quite complicated if you wanted to talk about a set of statements. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2005 19:35:48 UTC