> Sounds like Phil Bernstein's model management work, right? Good stuff. Exactly! It's a nice piece of work; no doubt the basic ideas will see wider deployment in the future. > What do you see as the problem with rdf:type? The need to identify a > specific type at all (which implies a set of types somewhere which I call it my RDF "litmus test". I think "rdf:type is optional, and at best a hint". It's the same sort of issues we had with XSD -- what is the boundary where XSD is useful? XSD for validation is fine. XSD as a type system is going too far. [0] http://www.netcrucible.com/blog/My+RDF+Litmus+Test.aspxReceived on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 17:40:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:55 UTC