HI, I am sorry but i dont understand the irony of "good" and "dead".. can you throw some light on it... Regards, Asankhaya http://asankhaya.blogspot.com --- Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuellegutierrez@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear William, > > I agree with your reflection and I love you for that > <green> > > Best regards, > Emmanuelle > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: semantic-web-request@w3.org > [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org]En > > nombre de William Loughborough > > Enviado el: jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2005 19:47 > > Para: Henry Story; semantic-web@w3.org > > Asunto: Re: How will the semantic web emerge > > > > > > > > Henry Story wrote: > > > > > The best way to start it, is to open up a > database of valuable data to > > > a SPARQL end point with a good ontology. > > > > The only "good" ontology is a dead ontology? > > > > Love. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.comReceived on Friday, 16 December 2005 12:26:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:40:57 UTC