- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:36:07 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: adrianw@snet.net, semantic-web@w3.org
On 12/6/05, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > Well, even an RDF-only store *should* be respecting the RDF semantic, which > does have some non-trivial inferences. Fair point. There is one set of inferences I think could be useful to have available in all SPARQL-capable stores - ?s ?p ?o . => ?p rdf:type rdf:Property . Being able to quickly check what predicates are in use in the store seems to me potentially to offer a heuristic for asking "what do you know about?" > I agree that there is the possibility of allowing stores that have different > functionality. I do not believe, however, that the current vision of the > Semantic Web supports a good way of providing this. Do you have any (links to?) alternative visions which would be more suitable? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:36:31 UTC