- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:12:50 -0800
- To: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Cc: "Semantic Web Forum" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <443F7259-AD35-4897-90AB-D5DBBC980DFA@reading.ac.uk>
Hans, It might not mean what you want it to mean. This says, in N- Triples, that <base+COIP-369539> rdf:type owl:Class . <base+COIP-369539> rdf:type owl:Thing . <base+COIP-369539> rdfs:label "rated output power"@en . <base+COIP-369539> rdfs:subClassOf <base+COIP-13281757> . <base+COIP-369539> rdf:type <base+COIP-369539> . i.e., the resource identified by that URI is both a Class and a Thing, labelled "rated output power", simultaneously being a subclass of 132..., and being a member of its own set. Unless you're doing something very strange indeed, and don't mind playing in the curious realm of OWL-Full (or perhaps not even that), you're probably doing something wrong. -R On 1 Dec 2005, at 21:37, Hans Teijgeler wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is it allowed to have, for the same baseURI, an owl:Class and an > owl:Thing with the same ID? > > > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="COIP-369539"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">rated output power</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#COIP-13281757"/> > </owl:Class> > > <owl:Thing rdf:ID="COIP-369539"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">rated output power</rdfs:label> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="#COIP-369539"/> > </owl:Thing> > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > _______________________ > > Hans Teijgeler > > ISO 15926 specialist > > www.InfowebML.ws > > hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl > > phone +31-72-509 2005 > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 December 2005 06:13:08 UTC