- From: Fabien Schwob <skink@evhr.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:11:16 +0100
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
> Well, you do not mention what kind of tools that you have available, but > there is a bunch of us over in Perl-land who think in the following > terms: I will mainly use PHP or Python. And to create the ontology I'm using Protégé. > I haven't actually done this yet, but others have, and what we have in > mind is to use Redland in the bottom, configure it to use any of the > Redland storages, when you query the model, you get data back as a > result set, that you transform and present to your users. It's seems to be really interesting, and if I'm not wrong, Redland can be used with Python. > The advantages are great: You can perform any queries SPARQL allows, and > that's a lot. You can expose all data, so anybody can use them for > whatever they like, and you yourself can easily add foreign sources to > your model. I really like this idea ! But what about performance and scalability issues ? In my case, is it a good idea to store all informations in some files ? To continue with that, I have another question about OWL. Must I save all my data in the same OWL file or must I cut the data in mutiple files ? > Now, I guess this response may be a bit overwhelming, because it > introduces a lot of concepts that you may not be familiar with. Also, I > haven't had time to actually do this, nevertheless, I think it is an > architecture with a great potential, and therefore I'd like to > encourage you to look further in this direction. Thanks for this response, it helped me to understand a little better what I can do with semweb. -- Fabien SCHWOB
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:11:20 UTC