- From: Vidar Hokstad <vhokstad@uk.yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:31:16 +0100
- To: John Flynn <jflynn@bbn.com>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <42553624.1050206@uk.yahoo-inc.com>
John Flynn wrote: > The following is a concept for a very simple (poor man's) tagging > scheme for marking up entities (instances) imbedded within html web > pages. The terms that are to be designated as instances of classes or > properties of some external rdfs/owl ontology are marked up using an > html-like tag <eN uri of ontology:class/property-name /eN>, where N is > the number of words in the instance name. > [snip] > Additional description and some examples of entity markup using the > FOAF and Wine ontologies, and an example of the cataloged results, are > at (1). > > > > (1) http://semanticsimulations.com/EML.htm > John, I have at least two concerns with your scheme and examples: - Why the word number approach to refer to elements, when HTML and XML has a well defined method of creating a relationship between data. Why don't you just enclose the data you want to mark up in a tag? It's what they're there for after all, and people _and_ tools already knows how to deal with that. - It isn't well formed XML or HTML. Given the number of tools that speak XML/HTML it would be significantly easier to work with this scheme if it was. Have you looked at RDF/A for instance as an alternative? (See http://www.formsplayer.com/notes/rdf-a.html). Why take this shortcut? It would force people to use custom parsers to deal with it. Regards, Vidar Hokstad
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:30:58 UTC