- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:23:31 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
yes and ++me As you can read on http://leobard.twoday.net/stories/607462/ URIQA and the use of the uriqa get mode does a good thing to query rdf sources. (.../uriqa?uri=....&....) I used the concepts of CBD and dereferencable URLs throughout www.gnowsis.org and it helped much. It was really easy to plug together * gnowsis and mindraider http://leobard.twoday.net/stories/607462/ * and gnowsis and fenfire http://leobard.twoday.net/stories/406584/ * and gnowsis and foafnaut http://leobard.twoday.net/stories/307895/ so from my side: * USE URLs (or google for uri crisis) * uriqa is it to get it fly for today (.."bootstrapping" as patrick put it) cheers Leo Es begab sich aber zu der Zeit 04.04.2005 07:17, da Patrick Stickler schrieb: > On Apr 1, 2005, at 17:10, ext Miles, AJ ((Alistair)) wrote: > >> >>> As far as I can tell, there is no formal, generalized >>> mechanism to reliably query the owner of a URI in order to >>> obtain an RDF Description of that URI. And this is a serious >>> impediment to the Semantic Web. >> >> >> I think this hits the nail on the head. >> >> A couple of thoughts ... >> >> First this extends beyond HTTP - how might one implement this for URN >> for example? Considering HTTP URIs only, URIQA is the only thing I >> know of that actually satisfies this requirement fully, but it would >> take a lot of time and effort to migrate to an http web that supports >> URIQA. > > > > Actually, because ..... > > It is my long held view that bootstrapping knowledge discovery for the > semantic > web, as an interface between the web and semantic web layers, must be > an integral > part of the foundational web machinery.
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 15:23:47 UTC