- From: Priscilla Walmsley <pwalmsley@datypic.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 18:59:33 +0000
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- CC: "public-xslt-40@w3.org" <public-xslt-40@w3.org>
Hi! I created a pull request with a fairly large number (hopefully not too many) of changes that I thought were straightforward. Obviously if I misunderstood anything about the spec I am happy to revise. I didn't add any elements/attributes that I found to be missing, thinking they may still be in the process of discussion. My list of things missing from the XSD is: @schema-role @mainmodule xsl:mode/@copy-namespaces xsl:item-type xsl:record-type xsl:field xsl:record xsl:expose/@component- values item-type and record-type I could take a stab at those if you think they are reasonably well defined. The rest of my comments are mostly things that could be improved but are not absolutely necessary. I may create additional pull requests in the future for those. I would actually love to join you on Tuesdays but I am already double-booked for that time! Thanks, Priscilla > -----Original Message----- > From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2025 10:00 AM > To: Priscilla Walmsley <pwalmsley@datypic.com> > Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org > Subject: Re: Numerous comments on the XSD for XSLT 4.0, what is the best way to > report/fix? > > Priscilla Walmsley <pwalmsley@datypic.com> writes: > > Happy to help out in whatever the most expedient way to fix these, including > doing some of the editing of the schema. > > Certainly, a pull request for any of the editorial corrections and typos would be > received with delight. If you think there are any more substantive changes, I’d be > happy with pull requests for those too, but perhaps different ones for the > separable issues. > > And you’re more than welcome to join the CG and hang out with us on Tuesday > morning’s if you like ;-) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norm Tovey-Walsh > Saxonica
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2025 18:59:44 UTC