- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:27:19 +0000
- To: Christian Grün <cg@basex.org>
- Cc: "public-xslt-40@w3.org" <public-xslt-40@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2024 23:27:35 UTC
> > I’ve stumbled upon the following two entries… > > <tests change="fn-codepoints-to-string" > count="2" > description="Function fn:codepoints-to-string becomes variadic (TODO???)"/> The tests being counted are K4-codepoints-to-string-90 and K4-codepoints-to-string-91. They were originally written in anticipation of issue #161, which has never been implemented, and in their current form they are just testing that the feature isn't implemented, awaiting a decision on the issue. > > Which test cases are counted here? Is this entry related to the proposal from Reece? > > https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/161 > > <tests change="fn-concat" > count="14" > description="Function fn:concat allows sequence-valued arguments (TODO???)"/> > > Maybe this one refers to… > > https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/701 > Yes. In fact the actual changes.xml file includes the PR number: <change id="fn-concat" PR="702">Function fn:concat allows sequence-valued arguments (TODO???)</change> it just hasn't been copied into the test case output. As I say, there's a lot of opportunity for cleaning up this data,. Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2024 23:27:35 UTC