- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:46:49 +0100
- To: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Message-Id: <29527EE2-CF37-4E8D-87AE-86F666119D4C@saxonica.com>
As an alternative to fos:result, you can have (for example)
<fos:error-result error-code="FOCV0004"/>
Michael Kay
> On 24 Oct 2023, at 22:25, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > and the fos:result should be valid XPath
>
> What should be the contents of fos:result in a case when the expected result is that a (type) error should be raised?
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:03 PM Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com <mailto:mike@saxonica.com>> wrote:
>> [ ] QT4CG-051-06: MK to help DN with the markup in fn:chain
>> examples.
>>
>> I'd suggest following the example markup used by fn:serialize or fn:transitive-closure.
>>
>> The <fos:example> element can enclose either a prose example or a testable example. Testable examples are preferred if at all possible! An example of a testable example is:
>>
>> <fos:example>
>> <fos:test use="transitive-closure-data">
>> <fos:expression><eg>let $tc := transitive-closure($direct-reports)
>> return $tc($data//person[@id="2"])/string(@id)</eg></fos:expression>
>> <fos:result>("3", "4", "6", "7", "8")</fos:result>
>> </fos:test>
>> </fos:example>
>>
>> The "use" attribute is a reference to variables that the example uses, in this case:
>>
>> <fos:variable name="data" id="transitive-closure-data"><![CDATA[document{<doc>
>> <person id="0"/>
>> <person id="1" manager="0"/>
>> <person id="2" manager="0"/>
>> <person id="3" manager="2"/>
>> <person id="4" manager="2"/>
>> <person id="5" manager="1"/>
>> <person id="6" manager="3"/>
>> <person id="7" manager="6"/>
>> <person id="8" manager="6"/>
>> </doc>}]]>
>> </fos:variable>
>>
>> If you use multiple variables, I suspect the "use" attribute can be a whitespace-separated list.
>>
>> The fos:expression should be valid XQuery (but use XPath if possible), and the fos:result should be valid XPath. Both contain expressions that should be context-free (except for references to variables, as discussed) and the results of the two expressions should compare equal when compared with deep-equal(). The fos:result expression, by convention, should contain only "constants", but that can include things like calls to constructor functions.
>>
>> The example gets turned into a human-readable example in the spec, and also into a test case in app/fo-spec-examples.xml, for example in this case
>>
>> <test-case name="fo-test-fn-transitive-closure-001">
>> <description>Test case for fn:transitive-closure</description>
>> <created by="Michael Kay using generate-qt3-test-set.xsl" on="2023-10-18"/>
>> <environment ref="global"/>
>> <dependency type="spec" value="XQ40+" satisfied="true"/>
>> <test>
>> let $data :=
>> document{<doc>
>> <person id="0"/>
>> <person id="1" manager="0"/>
>> <person id="2" manager="0"/>
>> <person id="3" manager="2"/>
>> <person id="4" manager="2"/>
>> <person id="5" manager="1"/>
>> <person id="6" manager="3"/>
>> <person id="7" manager="6"/>
>> <person id="8" manager="6"/>
>> </doc>}
>>
>> return
>>
>>
>> let $tc := transitive-closure($direct-reports)
>> return $tc($data//person[@id="2"])/string(@id)
>> </test>
>> <result>
>> <assert-deep-eq>("3", "4", "6", "7", "8")</assert-deep-eq>
>> </result>
>> </test-case>
>>
>>
>> Michael Kay
>> Saxonica
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2023 21:47:09 UTC