- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 20:23:12 +0100
- To: public-xslt-40@w3.org
I looked at the test failures: fo-test-fn-contains-sequence-012 Error in test: XPST0003 expected ")", found "<eof>" fo-test-fn-deep-equal-009, -012, -013, 014 Spec changes for numeric comparisons not yet implementd fo-test-fn-ends-with-sequence-008 Error in test: XPST0081 Namespace prefix 'fos' has not been declared fo-test-fn-ends-with-sequence-011 Error in test: XPST0003 expected ")", found "<eof>" fo-test-fn-expanded-QName-001, -002 Not yet implemented in Saxon fo-test-fn-identity-003 Example is not testable as written: XPDY0002 Finding root of tree: the context item is absent fo-test-fn-items-at-002 Saxon result differs from expected result fo-test-fn-iterate-while-004 Saxon result is very close to expected result: 1983.99999999999999999985687255859375 fo-test-fn-replace-009, -010, -011, -012, -013 Syntax error in example code fo-test-fn-slice-001 .. -020 Feature not implemented in Saxon fo-test-fn-starts-with-sequence-008, -011 See -ends-with- fo-test-map-of-001... Not yet implemented in Saxon fo-test-map-values-... Not yet implemented in Saxon Altogether, a useful exercise! Michael Kay Saxonica
Received on Saturday, 6 May 2023 19:23:20 UTC