Re: QT4 CG Meeting 006 Proposed Agenda 2022-10-11

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 10:24 AM Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:51 AM Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
>> Could we prioritize things where we have an actual pull request - e.g.
>> fn:op (issue #83)? Partly because PRs will get more difficult to merge in
>> as they age.
>>
>
> Yes, and a number of other proposals already are using fn:op() in their
> definitions, thus fn:op() needs to be done before we review them.
>


In particular, fn:op() is used in the definition of map:build() (#151),
thus must precede it in the agenda list.


>
>
>