- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:50:49 +0530
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: Christian GrĂ¼n <cg@basex.org>, public-xslt-40@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2021 06:21:19 UTC
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:54 PM Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > One approach might be to provide an extended form of the collation-key() > function which can be used something like this: > > sort($data, by: sort-key([ > map{'select': ->{last-name), 'order': 'ascending', 'collation': > $surname-collation}, > map('select': ->(first-name), 'order': 'descending', 'collation': > $firstname-collation}])) > I really, like this idea, and would support adding it to XPath 4.0 (and hence, to XSLT 4.0 as well). This shall make the XPath fn:sort function, completely defined, with respect to having any number of sort keys. (I think, you made a little typo at {last-name). You probably wanted, a left parenthesis instead of a left curly brace.) > > But I wonder if it's really needed, since both XSLT and XQuery have this > level of capability already. We don't have to put everything into XPath. > I think that, its quite likely, XPath (all versions) could be used in contexts other than XSLT and XQuery (although, these are the most common uses of XPath). I guess, adding the discussed fn:sort function improvements, shall be helpful in long run. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2021 06:21:19 UTC