Re: TECHNICAL SUMMARY of XSL WG telcon 2016-09-22

Dear all,

Please find the XSLT 3.0 RNC updated from last internal draft

https://github.com/innovimax/xslt30/blob/master/xslt30.rnc

Regards,

Mohamed

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:

>
>
> 4. Review of actions
>
>
> ACTION 2016-03-03-001: Charles Foster to develop an RNG schema for
> XSLT 3.0 (either from scratch or on the basis of Mohammed Zergaoui's
> old RNG schema for XSLT 2.0).
> (Status -04-28: CF is carrying on from where Mohammed left off on the RNG
> schema. He's testing the schema against the test suite and now  has a
> 96.5% pass
> rate.)
>  In progress – status?
>
> §§ A test catalog-010 has been committed to the test suite. The driver to
> run this from Saxon is called Saxon-Jing and is on Github. See also
> http://cfoster.net/saxon-jing
>
> §§ ACTION 2016-09-22-001 on MK and Abel to run the Relax-NG / Jing test
> and report results and/or bugs (which may result in follow-up actions for
> Charles). ETA 09-29.
>
>
> 7. XSLT Draft
>
> The diff version is at the usual location. A new version was posted on 11
> Sept, which unfortunately went unnannounced on the mailing list.
>
> Published CR: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-xslt-30-20151119/
>
> Internal version:
> https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xslt-
> 30/html/Overview.html
> W3C Candidate Recommendation 11 September 2016
>
> 8. Spec bugs
>
>
> 29814 [xslt30] Use of XPath comments
>  MK proposal in comment 1.
>
> §§ Abel and MSMcQ think it might be simpler to allow comments more
> liberally, including in for example name="f:goForIt (:quickly:)". MK: but
> what about yes/no attributes, or attributes taking a decimal literal? Users
> won't know whether we have defined the version attribute in terms of an
> XPath production or not. And if we allow version="1.0 (:really:)" then we
> have to change our schema to allow it (otherwise the schema becomes a lot
> less useful).
>
> §§ There was discussion about whether we can define types that accept
> comments, but that's difficult because comments can be nested and therefore
> can't be defined fully using regular expressions.
>
> §§ ACTION 2016-09-22-004 MK to make a proposal taking the above discussion
> into account.
>
>
> 29827 [XSLT 3.0] Error XTDE0045 revisited
>
> §§ ACTION 2016-09-22-003 MK: try to express the rules in the form of a
> table. Abel phrases it in terms that if declared-modes="yes" then the mode
> "doesn't exist" unless it is declared and it then becomes an error to refer
> to it.
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €