- From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:41:37 +0000
- To: 'Public XSLWG' <public-xsl-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl>, liam@w3.org
should result in Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <02cf01d17adc$6dfd36c0$49f7a440$@xs4all.nl> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:52:11PM +0100, Abel Braaksma wrote: > > > > XSLT 1.0: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt > > and https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt/ > > (no redirects between the two) We could change the shortname for this one to xslt-10 and have a cover page at /TR/xslt explaining the different XSLT specifications, level of maintenance, and maturity (for 3.0) > > XSLT 1.1 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11 > > redirects to https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/ > > > > THIS STILL EXISTS... This one already has a statement in the status of the document saying it's no longer developed and pointing to xslt20. I think it's fine as is. > > XSLT 2.0 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20 > > redirects to https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ There's nothing we can do about the trailing slashes, it's the same for almost all the W3C specs. But, we might have an additional redirect from xslt-20 to xslt20. > > XSLT 2.1 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-21/ > > THIS LINK DOES NOT REDIRECT AND SHOWS XSLT 3.0 > > > > I suggest we change this to redirect to xslt 3.0 to remove confusion Fixed already. > > XSLT 3.0 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30 > > redirects to https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/ > > XPath 1.0 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath > > redirects to https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/ It is not redirecting but there's a big red box with a statement pointing to XPath-31. I suppose it's fine. That's the alternative to the cover page that we could implement for /TR/xslt I suggest that we have both the cover page (+change of shortname to xslt-10) AND a big red box with such a statement. While there was no intent to make 1.0 obsolete when 2.0 became a Recommendation, I think it is now time to move on. > > XPath 2.1 > > https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-21 > > redirects to https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-21/ > > > > Other than XSLT 2.1, this document does not link to (though Latest Version), > > or redirect to XPath 3.0, nor has it a NOTICE. Good point. I think it could redirect to xpath-30. This also applies to: https://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-11 https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization-11 https://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx-11 https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel-11 Maybe Liam can tell more about those. -- Carine Bournez /// W3C Europe
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2016 10:41:40 UTC