- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:30:33 +0100
- To: public-xsl-wg@w3.org
> I am committing a new spec at file:///Users/mike/w3c/qtspecs/specifications/xslt-30/html/Overview-diff.html, dated 15 Sept 2015. >> ACTION-2015-04-23-001: MK to add a section to the back matter suitable >> for pointing to the RelaxNG schema. >> status: still pending >> > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-001: MKay to add fn:available-system-properties() to the spec >> Completed, see 20.3.5 > > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-003: MKay to review the impact of supporting XP3.1 with arrays in >> XSLT3.0 (bug 29079) >> completed - see email > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0007.html > > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-004: MK to propose wording for bug 29081 prohibiting use >> reserved namespaces in extensions functions/attributes > >> completed - see Bugzilla > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29081#c1 > > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-005: MK to fix 29084 according to the proposed resolution >> completed > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-006: MK to fix 29086 by removing the sentence as proposed. >> completed > >> ACTION 2015-09-03-007: MK to send email summarizing the proposed changes for bug 29088. >> completed - see Bugzilla > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29088#c4 > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29088#c5 I don’t have any record of a decision on this one, but my recollection was that we discussed it and were favourably disposed. I have therefore applied the necessary changes so the WG can review them, but I have left the bug open. > > >> 6.4.1 XSLT 3.0, XPath 3.1, including arrays >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0007.html - MK >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0014.html - Abel > >> Abel wants to consider xsl:array / xsl:array-item, similar to >> xsl:map/xsl:map-entry. > > We reviewed the background of this topic. > > Part (A) on streamability: we just need to draft the rule changes. > > ACTION 2015-09-10-001: MK to draft the streamability rule changes > needed to address the use of XSLT 3.0 with XPath 3.1 (as outlined in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0007.html part > (A)) Done in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0006.html > > Part (B) on arrays. > > ACTION 2015-09-10-002: MK to make a proposal on how to handle arrays > in the template-match rules (as outlined in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0007.html part > (B) and discussed on 10 September [arrays as functions, or atomized?]) I’ve extended the scope of bug 29079 [xslt 3.0] (was: xsl:where-populated and empty arrays) to handle all aspects of support for arrays in XSLT 3.0. >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29079 See bugzilla. The proposal also refers to https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0004.html > > RESOLVED: to allow xsl:use-package as a child of xsl:stylesheet. > > ACTION 2015-09-10-003: MK to revised the spec text to allow > xsl:use-package as a child of xsl:stylesheet (and clearly so). Created bug 29121 to track this issue, and I have applied the changes to the spec. > > ACTION 2015-09-10-004: MK to open a Bugzilla entry for the issue > identified in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2015Sep/0015.html and > explain the issues. Created bug 29122 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29122 I’ve applied the suggested changes to the spec in anticipation. > > >> 28955 [XSLT30] xsl:try should probably include xs:error in its enumeration >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28955 >> Resolved at last meeting. To be closed when MK has implemented >> in spec. and ABr has completed action item to submit bug for XP 3.1 > > The resolution is now in the spec; the bug can be closed. > > ACTION 2015-09-10-005: SCA to close bug 18955. The reference should be to bug 28955. > > >> 29081 [xslt 3.0] Use of reserved namespaces in extensions - MK submitter >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29081 >> see proposal in bugzilla > > We reviewed the proposal and approved it. > > [Scribe's note: at least, I believe we approved it. I lost voice > contact with the call just as the discussion here was concluding.] My notes indicate that we did indeed approve it. I have applied the changes and marked the bug as resolved. > > >> 29084 [xslt 3.0]default-mode - ancestor, or ancestor-or-self? - MK submitter >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29084 I’ve taken the liberty of closing this editorially. > >> 29086 [xslt 3.0] Conformance section: recoverable errors - MK submitter >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29086 My notes say that we agreed to fix this during the 2015-09-03 meeting. It has now been fixed and is marked resolved. > > >> 29113 [XSLT30] fn:system-property does not a allow an EQName - Abel >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 This is still open, but the bug is so “obvious” that I’ve applied the change to the spec and I have added a test case. > > 29117 default-collation and xsl:merge-key > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29117 > > RESOLVED: to adopt the proposal in this bug report. > The spec has been updated and the bug is marked resolved. > Michael Kay Saxonica
Received on Monday, 14 September 2015 15:31:00 UTC