RE: ACTION A-645-07: schema for serialization parameters

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen [mailto:cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 10:10 PM
>
> > So, I would assume that normalization does *not* take place (I will raise an
> > XPath bug for this, as the specs seems to disagree on this amongst each
> > other).
> 
> No, I don't think so.  The XPath spec is consistent with XSD here, I think.

I agree now, I was mistaken. I found it hard to find the definitive verdict, browsing through the specs, while a line in the XPath spec clearly suggests the whitespace normalization taking place.

> 
> >
> > In short: I agree with your assessment that whitespaces SHOULD  be
> > allowed
> 
> I don't think I said that, at least not in the sense that I think it's a good idea
> to allow whitespace in URIs or to allow whitespace within the brackets in
> an EQName.  I think I said that the XPath grammar currently seems
> to allow them, and that I believe the schema for serialization parameters
> should align with the XPath grammar.

Yes, I misunderstood. So we should allow them in the serialization-XSD.

Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 11:18:59 UTC