- From: Robie, Jonathan <jonathan.robie@emc.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:38:56 +0000
- To: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>, Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 18:41:02 UTC
On 6/26/16, 9:03 PM, "Michael Dyck" <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> wrote: >If we're going to say "X's associated expression" here, then "X" has to be >"the extension expression". Like this? An extension expression consists of one or more pragmas, followed by an optional expression (the extension expression's associated expression). >But personally, I think it sounds odd to refer >to a sub-expression of X as "X's associated expression" (because >"associated" is a weak and non-specific word for something that already >has a strong and fairly specific relation to X). I guess Iım not convinced that the expression always provides fallback behavior. For instance, in this example, the expression is evaluated whether or not the pragma is recognized: declare namespace exq = "http://example.org/XQueryImplementation"; (# exq:use-index #) { $bib/book/author[name='Berners-Lee'] } We provide two examples, one is a fallback expression, the other one isnıt. Iım not sure that fallback expressions are the main use. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 18:41:02 UTC