Re: Reporting on QT3 test results for the 3.1 Specs

Hi,

sadly I am late to the party.

Does anyone still care about 3.0 or even 1.0/xpath 2.0 results?

Bye,
Benito



On 01/08/2016 03:08 PM, O'Neil Delpratt wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Further to my email in December regarding the reporting of the QT3 
> test results. We now have BaseX results in the reports. See: 
> http://dev.w3.org/2011/QT3-test-suite/ReportingResults31/report.html
>
> Thanks to Christian Grün for sending the BaseX results.
>
> kind regards,
>
> -------------------------------
> O'Neil Delpratt
> Software Developer, Saxonica Limited
> Email: oneil@saxonica.com <mailto:oneil@saxonica.com>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/ond1
> Tel: +44 118 946 5894
> Web: http://www.saxonica.com
> Saxonica Community site: http://dev.saxonica.com
> Bug tracking site: https://saxonica.plan.io/
>
>
>> On 6 Dec 2015, at 18:02, O'Neil Delpratt <oneil@saxonica.com 
>> <mailto:oneil@saxonica.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> As promised in the telcon last week. I have now published preliminary 
>> reports for the result from Saxonica of the QT3 test suite. Here we 
>> are focusing on the 3.1 Specs:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/2011/QT3-test-suite/ReportingResults31/report.html
>>
>> There were some disputed test cases which we did not run, we noted 
>> the reasons why in the results file.
>>
>> I encourage other vendors to send in their results ASAP!
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>