- From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:08:20 +0100
- To: "O'Neil Delpratt" <oneil@saxonica.com>
- Cc: Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
Hi O'Neil, > I find 2) much more useful: > 2) > http://dev.w3.org/2011/QT3-test-suite/ReportingResults31/report.html#optComboFeatures I also prefer this representation. > Using 1) or 2) we observe that we have 75 tests with dependency on > staticTyping not being passed by any implementation (including those with > combinations of other dependencies). I would like to ask if it still merits > having tests on static typing? I could live well without the static typing features (they seem rather outdated to me, and most current implementations have all kinds of other optimizations that are not tested anyway). I will send you an updated version of our tests in a minute (thanks to the html rendering, I noticed that we ignored various of the test cases so far). Best, Christian > > kind regards, > > > ------------------------------- > O'Neil Delpratt > Software Developer, Saxonica Limited > Email: oneil@saxonica.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/ond1 > Tel: +44 118 946 5894 > Web: http://www.saxonica.com > Saxonica Community site: http://dev.saxonica.com > Bug tracking site: https://saxonica.plan.io/ > > >
Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 16:09:08 UTC