Re: Semantics of function calls

On 16-02-09 05:28 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
>
> Since further particulars are devolved, we need say nothing about cases
> that are outside the responsibility of our spec ("host language
> functions", "external functions", etc). We say what information is
> available to them, and they can do what they like with it.

That's more or less what I was saying back here:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jan/0005.html
(in approach (2) at the bottom).

Meeting #628 seemed to like the approach. I'm not quite sure why it was 
abandoned.

-Michael

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 02:24:49 UTC